Who often causes more harm than external hackers, as highlighted by examples like WikiLeaks?

Insiders can often cause more harm than external hackers due to their unique position within an organization. They usually have established access to sensitive data and systems, which enables them to exploit vulnerabilities or data access controls easily. The motivations of insiders can vary, ranging from personal grievances, financial gain, to ideological beliefs, which can lead them to misappropriate information or engage in sabotage.

The example of WikiLeaks highlights how insiders, like whistleblowers or disgruntled employees, can leak classified information that poses significant risks to organizations and national security. This access and understanding of internal processes often give insiders an advantage over external threats, who lack the detailed knowledge of the organization’s systems and security measures. As a result, the insider threat remains a critical concern in cybersecurity, emphasizing the need for robust monitoring and security protocols to mitigate these risks.